The Basics Of Used Car Financing

As if the process of purchasing a used automobile wasn’t convoluted enough, a potential buyer also has to consider a little detail known as used car financing. The truth is that while most would love to do so, the average automobile buyer simply can’t afford to put down enough cash to purchase a new auto. When considering where to get used car financing, there are a few key factors to consider before making the decision. Chief among those factors would be the knowledge of the basic information regarding the financing plans available to a buyer.

One of the things to keep in mind when considering used car financing would be the terms of the agreement. What the terms basically boil down to would be how long a buyer has to pay off the car in full. In general, longer loans have the interest spread out more evenly, resulting in lower monthly rates. Of course, the drawback for longer terms would be that the buyer may end up making interest payments that add up to an amount, which is significantly higher than what the auto is actually worth on the market. The way to avoid such a situation is to agree to a shorter loan term, though a shorter term forces the buyer to pay larger monthly payments.

Also, any buyer should check his credit rating and credit history before engaging in used car financing. A poor credit rating can result in disadvantageous loan terms, or in unacceptable loan applications. The financial institutions assume that a poor credit rating indicates the applicant as a financial risk. While the payments are smaller, in the long run, longer loan terms turn into profits for lending groups, so the groups extend terms on applicants with poor credit ratings. Financial history, as mentioned, also plays a key role. A history of bankruptcy or defaulted debts can either kill the application immediately or put the applicant at a severe disadvantage when negotiating loan terms.

Equally important to considering the terms would be the location to get used car financing. Every used car buyer has several options to choose from, each with a set of features that the others do not typically have. However, each option also has some sort of caveat that may prove unattractive for some buyers. The most common options are used auto dealerships and financial institutions such as banks, financing specialist websites, and credit unions. Credit history and credit rating are both factors that all the institutions above would consider, though the importance that previous financial records play in the application process varies from business to business.

Once a buyer has determined which financing group to go to and has managed to negotiate acceptable terms and conditions from the lending company, the used car financing deal can be signed. As with any other major financial transaction, used car financing should not be taken lightly and anyone who is going to obtain such a financing agreement should carefully consider the minute details first, as well as assess their own situation. Only by analyzing one’s financial capabilities, as well as their personal situation, can a person determine just what type of financing arrangement would be ideal.

Why Early-Stage Startup Companies Should Hire a Lawyer

Many startup companies believe that they do not need a lawyer to help them with their business dealings. In the early stages, this may be true. However, as time goes on and your company grows, you will find yourself in situations where it is necessary to hire a business lawyer and begin to understand all the many benefits that come with hiring a lawyer for your legal needs.

The most straightforward approach to avoid any future legal issues is to employ a startup lawyer who is well-versed in your state’s company regulations and best practices. In addition, working with an attorney can help you better understand small company law. So, how can a startup lawyer help you in ensuring that your company’s launch runs smoothly?

They Know What’s Best for You

Lawyers that have experience with startups usually have worked in prestigious law firms, and as general counsel for significant corporations.

Their strategy creates more efficient, responsive, and, ultimately, more successful solutions – relies heavily on this high degree of broad legal and commercial knowledge.

They prioritize learning about a clients’ businesses and interests and obtaining the necessary outcomes as quickly as feasible.

Also, they provide an insider’s viewpoint and an intelligent methodology to produce agile, creative solutions for their clients, based on their many years of expertise as attorneys and experience dealing with corporations.

They Contribute to the Increase in the Value of Your Business

Startup attorneys help represent a wide range of entrepreneurs, operating companies, venture capital firms, and financiers in the education, fashion, finance, health care, internet, social media, technology, real estate, and television sectors.

They specialize in mergers and acquisitions as well as working with companies that have newly entered a market. They also can manage real estate, securities offerings, and SEC compliance, technology transactions, financing, employment, entertainment and media, and commercial contracts, among other things.

Focusing on success must include delivering the highest levels of representation in resolving the legal and business difficulties confronting clients now, tomorrow, and in the future, based on an unwavering dedication to the firm’s fundamental principles of quality, responsiveness, and business-centric service.

Wrapping Up

All in all, introducing a startup business can be overwhelming. You’re already charged with a host of responsibilities in which you’re untrained as a business owner. Legal problems are notoriously difficult to solve, and interpreting “legalese” is sometimes required. Experienced business lawyers know these complexities and can help you navigate them to avoid stumbling blocks.

Although many company owners wait until the last minute to deal with legal issues, they would benefit or profit greatly from hiring an experienced startup lawyer even before they begin. Reputable startup lawyers can give essential legal guidance, assist entrepreneurs in avoiding legal hazards, and improve their prospects of becoming a successful company.

Think Twice Before Getting Financial Advice From Your Bank

This startling figure comes from a recent review of the financial advice offered from the big four banks by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC).

Even more startling: 10% of advice was found to leave investors in an even worse financial position.

Through a “vertically integrated business model”, Commonwealth Bank, National Australia Bank, Westpac, ANZ and AMP offer ‘in house’ financial advice, and collectively, control more than half of Australia’s financial planners.

It’s no surprise ASIC’s review found advisers at these banks favoured financial products that connected to their parent company, with 68% of client’s funds invested in ‘in house’ products as oppose to external products that may have been on the firms list.

Why the banks integrated financial advice model is flawed

It’s hard to believe the banks can keep a straight face and say they can abide by the duty for advisers to act absolutely in the best interests of a client.

Under the integrated financial advice model, there are layers of different fees including adviser fees, platform fees and investment management fees adding up to 2.5-3.5%

The typical breakdown of fees is usually as follows: an adviser charge of 0.8% to 1.1%, a platform fee of between 0.4% and 0.8%, and a managed fund fee of between 0.7% and 2.1%. These fees are not only opaque, but are sufficiently high to limit the ability of the client to quickly earn real rates of return.

Layers of fees placed into the business model used by the banks means there is not necessarily an incentive for the financial advice arm to make a profit, because the profits can be made in the upstream parts of the supply chain through the banks promoting their own products.

This business model, however, is flawed, and cannot survive in a world where people are demanding greater accountability for their investments, increased transparency in relation to fees and increased control over their investments.

It is noteworthy that the truly independent financial advisory firms in Australia that offer separately managed accounts have done everything in their power to avoid using managed funds and keep fee’s competitive.

The banks have refused to admit their integrated approach to advice is fatally flawed. When the Australian Financial Review approached the Financial Services Council (FSC), a peak body that represents the ‘for-profit’ wealth managers, for a defence if the layered fee arrangements, a spokesman said no generalisations could be made.

There are fundamental flaws in the advice model, and it will be interesting to see what the upcoming royal commission into banking will do to change some of the contentious issues surround integrated financial advice.

Many financial commentators are calling for a separation of financial advice attached to banks, with obvious bias and failure to meet the best interests of clients becoming more apparent.

Chris Brycki, CEO of Stockspot, says “investors should receive fair and unbiased financial advice from experts who will act in the best interests of their client. What Australians currently get is product pushing from salespeople who are paid by the banks.”

Brycki is calling for structural reform to fix the problems caused by the dominant market power of the banks to ensure that consumers are protected, advisers are better educated and incentives are aligned.

Stockspot’s annual research into high-fee-charging funds shows thousands of customers of banks are being recommended bank aligned investment products despite the potential of more appropriate alternatives being available.